In “The Economic Consequences of Proposed California Budget Cuts,” 1 we estimated the statewide economic impact of Governor Schwarzenegger’s proposed fiscal year (FY) 2010–2011 budget using IMPLAN 3.0, an industry- standard input-output modeling software package. We fo und that the proposed cuts to major health and human services programs would have the greatest impact on job loss and state and local tax revenue reduction, compared to other budget solutions. In this brief, we report the economic impact by region2 using a similar methodology.
Our methodology is described in detail in “The Economic Consequences of Proposed California Budget Cuts.” The proposed spending cuts were allocated by region based on current program spending or utilization by county. CalWORKs, IHSS, Healthy Families and SSI cuts were allocated based on California Budget Project estimates of the budget impact. 3 Child care cuts were allocated based on the percentage of children served in non-CalWORKs child care programs, based on data provided by the California Child Care Resource and Referral Network. Medi-Cal cuts were allocated based on California Department of Health Care Services Medi-Cal enrollment data. 4 Mental health cuts were allocated based on California Department of Mental Health client data. 5 Food stamp cuts were allocated based on the value of state-only benefit issuances according to the California Department of Social Services. 6
- Ken Jacobs, Laurel Lucia and T. William Lester, “The Economic Consequences of Proposed California Budget Cuts,” UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education Policy Brief, May 2010, https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/pdf/2010/budget_impact10.pdf.
- Regions were defined based on groups of counties. Bay Area: Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano and Sonoma; Central Coast: Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz and Ventura; Los Angeles: Los Angeles; Northern/Sierra: Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, Glenn, Humboldt, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Mariposa, Mendocino, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne, Yuba; Other Southern: Imperial, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego; Sacramento Area: El Dorado, Placer, Sacramento, Yolo; San Joaquin Area: Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Tulare.
- California Budget Project, “The Governor’s Proposed Budget Would Eliminate CalWORKs Cash Assistance for More than 1.4 Million Low-Income Children and Parents,” March 19, 2010, http://www.cbp.org/pdfs/2010/100319_CalWorks_County.pdf. “The Governor’s Proposed Budget would Eliminate In-Home Supportive Services for More than 476,000 Low-Income Seniors and People with Disabilities,” April 23, 2010, http://www.cbp.org/pdfs/2010/100425_IHSS_Program_Cuts__county.pdf. “The Governor’s Proposed Budget could Cause More than 1 Million Children to Lose Health Benefits or Coverage,” February 26, 2010, http://www.cbp.org/pdfs/2010/100226_HFP_Cuts_%20Fact_Sheet.pdf. “The Governor’s Proposed Cuts to the SSI/SSP and CAPI Programs Would Affect Nearly 950,000 Californians,” March 11, 2010, http://www.cbp.org/pdfs/2010/100311_County_SSI-SSP.pdf.
- California Department of Health Care Services, “Medi-Cal Beneficiary Counts Pivot Table – Most Recent 24 Months,” http://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/Pages/default.aspx. Analysis based on June 2010 data.
- California Department of Mental Health Client and Service Information Service, “Unduplicated Count of Clients Served by County and Month of Service,” Fiscal Year 2008-2009, http://www.dhcs.ca.gov/dataandstats/Pages/default.aspx.
- California Department of Social Services, “Food Stamp Program Participation and Benefits Issuance Report,” April 2010, http://www.dss.cahwnet.gov/research/PG352.htm.